Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Week Thirteen Readings
The two other websites scare the crap out of me, which is kind of the point. We've become accustomed to and reliant on technologies without fully considering their effects. As current or soon-to-be information professionals, we need to think about both costs and benefits, and what role(s) privacy can and should play. The links page on No Place to Hide is a good start. For Enemy of the State-style goodness, read the final chapter of No Place to Hide, the book, and if you want to laugh to keep from crying, go here (sound).
It's important to remember that just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not out to get you.
Friday, November 21, 2008
Muddiest Point #11
Muddiest Point #10
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Week Twelve Readings
I’m actually using a wiki right now to collaborate on an online poster in LIS 2000. Good times. Anyway, this article makes wikis out to be all things to all people, and that can be dangerous. Wikis are not a panacea and will be met with hostility from technophobic faculty who think of this when they think of wikis. They’re probably better used at larger libraries, in terms of staffing, than smaller ones, me thinks.
A folksonomy is “a taxonomy created by ordinary folks.” There’s no interoperability here because each user can come up with their own tags, and this has pros and cons.
Pro: it’s easy, and maybe even fun to tag stuff, and anything that gets people using libraries is on balance a good thing.
Con: everyone giving an item their own tag leads to a jungle of garbled messes and missed opportunities to connect and communicate. Bring on the semantic web!
The video is nice, but we've been using Wikipedia all semester long, and I bet most of us have used it longer than that, so this video is a little late for Lenny.
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Friday, November 14, 2008
Week Eleven Readings
Seems like the latter in the first article, which sums up university efforts to digitize and make (parts of) their collections available online.
I thought the UI attempt at adding mark-ups to footnotes in journals was pretty cool – a very good idea since reference librarians (and me) tell patrons to keep following the sources and citations when researching.
There wasn’t much mention of what happens when for-profits get into the act, like GoogleScholar, Ex Libris and the like.
The next article talks about the Digital Libraries Initiative, a 1994 project by the National Science Foundation, which was complicated by the explosion of the web. I don’t have much to say about it, although I enjoyed the cheeky tone of the piece.
Institutional repositories are “a set of services that a university offers to the members of its community for the management and dissemination of digital materials created by the institution and its community members.” It’s important to note that repositories are not static; as technology changes, so must they, if only to make sure that the information they contain is legible and readable to future generations.
I also liked that Lynch mentioned the rights of faculty, the producers, in repositories, as well as the role that OAI can play.
Fun fact, you can see my undergraduate honor’s thesis at Colby’s digital archive.
Final note: I wonder what are the implications of these public-private partnerships that Lynch talks about?
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Pitt Website Assignment - Take 2
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Muddiest Point #9
Week Ten Readings
Oh, and here's what OAI can do for you: http://www.oaister.org/
